Tale of two city maps

While wandering around London, where I’m attending CS Forum 11, I’ve got lost a couple times. So I’ve found myself consulting map signs on the sidewalk.

Here are close-ups of two that I used. They are very similar, but one was instantly more helpful than the other. Can you guess which one and why?

20110906-105014.jpg

20110906-105311.jpg
For me the second one is the winner, thanks to the line directly perpendicular to the “you are here” arrow.

That little line represents the street sign I was looking at, so I instantly knew which way I was facing. That information combined with my knowledge of where I wanted to go helped me get there faster.

Good navigation not only tells you where you are, but also give you orientation — it accounts for your context.

Leave a Comment

A plea for the inverted pyramid

Spotted this while waiting for an x-ray. It’s a poster explaining the risk of allergies to iodine used as a contrast agent in medical imaging.

Honestly, the graphic design and structure do nothing to reassure and inform. The most important message is in the conclusion, but you have to wade through a mess of words and jargon to get there. And don’t even get me started on the typography.

20110819-021422.jpg

Leave a Comment

Does your content strategy have principles?

I’ve been reading and listening to a lot of visual, UX and software designers recently. The practice of design has always fascinated me. It started early on, when I received a crash course on graphic design from the first art director I ever worked with. He taught me that I shouldn’t write or think in a bubble, disconnected from the design. He taught me that thanks to design the value of the whole was greater than the sum of the words and the pictures.

His early lessons clued me into the basic principles of design. Then, as my career took me into web content, I began hearing about design principles from the UX people I worked with.

Their design principles were different. They were like a manifesto for the project, steering design choices and serving as a litmus test for new features and developments. Here are some examples:

I discovered that what these design principles said – and how they said it – conveyed something much deeper than what you find in a set of boring technical specification or client brief (or a style guide for that matter).

Applicable to CS?

I think it would be a good idea if content strategy projects had their own set of content design principles.

Erin Kissane outlines seven basic principles of content strategy in the first chapter of her book The Elements of Content Strategy:

  • Good content is appropriate
  • Good content is useful
  • Good content is user-centered
  • Good content is clear
  • Good content is consistent
  • Good content is concise
  • Good content is supported

I totally agree with them; they are mandatories for all CS projects. But why not push the idea a step further and create design principles for your own project?

A marketing-driven project might have principles like:

  • When available, video content front and center
  • Demonstrates product benefits (show don’t tell)
  • Make content enjoyable on any device
  • Use questions as conversation starters
  • Digestible doses, not tedious screeds

While a customer service project might have these:

  • Write for your grandmother
  • Never talk down
  • Break answers into clear steps
  • Always ask if the content was helpful
  • English isn’t everyone’s mother tongue

I have found that writing design principles for a project’s content strategy can help:

  • Establish the tone of voice of the content before the creation begins
  • Obtain management buy-in (because they’re short)
  • Inform writers about style
  • Translate branding to content
  • Address business objectives
  • Guide UX
  • Clue in web designers to content requirements
  • Ward off backseat writers and grammarians

More deviously, they can also help battle my two pet peeves: best practices and the God Complex. Best practices are a good idea that has been perverted by laziness. They turn people into copiers and followers; they blunt ambition. Content strategy projects are typically too complex for one person to have all the answers. There’s no such thing as a right content strategy or a wrong strategy. You either have one or you don’t. Each one should be as original as your organization is.

In my experience, writing design principles helps move you from paying too much attention to what other people are doing and saying (and never making an original decision) to taking a clear first step towards full ownership of the content.

Leave a Comment

Playing with the truth

How not to endear yourself to weary travelers.

Don’t fib in English in the headline and tell the truth in French in the subhead.

15 minutes on complimentary Wi-Fi isn’t Wi-Fi For Free.

20110712-124238.jpg

Leave a Comment
Image

More underwear showing: The escape of the lorem ipsum

While wireframes with lorem ipsum raise the hackles of most content strategists, it’s even worse when it’s allowed to run wild in a production environment. Case in point: I stumbled across this piece of filler content (test bandeau) on the Château de Versailles home page this morning. Oops.

Don't let your lorem ipsum run wild

.

Leave a Comment

Contextualized targeting has limits

Trying to contextualize advertising on mobile devices has its limits.

I’m a regular users of the NYT iPhone app. Over the few months I’ve started seeing advertising for French products and services, which isn’t a bad idea.

But it’s important to get the demographics right. For example, trying to sell me a debit card for teenagers is a waste of money.

20110627-091053.jpg

Leave a Comment

Lost in translation

Some translations are so bad that they have an almost surreal quality to them. I spotted this one yesterday in a Paris parking garage/car park.

20110609-084624.jpg

Leave a Comment
Quote

Disintermediation of the ad agency?

“…the magazine’s job within Bloomberg is to create added value to the terminal business.”

This quote comes from a short but thought-provoking post by Noah Brier, one of the few bloggers that I read on a regular basis. I find it interesting because I think one of the fundamental obstacles to the widespread acceptance of content strategy is the advertising industry mindset.

Publishers used to run ads to generate revenues that supported their selling of content (journalism) at a loss. Advertisers used to spend money producing ads to sell their products and services. But what happens if advertisers publish content to add value to their products, like Bloomberg or Red Bull are doing? What’s left for the advertising agency?  Smells like disintermediation to me.

Image

Your underwear is showing

Shopping Cart Error Message

Is this really supposed to be reassuring?

While shopping online today I was presented with this screed of code at the bottom of the Shipping Method Selection page. Goes on for lines and lines. How many people would run away when faced with this? Definitely doesn’t inspire much confidence. And I love the “will go away eventually” line. Error message content at its finest. Proof that sometimes the best content is no content at all. Instead, bang the table and get people to fix the problem instead of shaving the bear.

Leave a Comment

What’s the [exclamation] point?

While looking for travel insurance I stumbled across this piece of content. The product is entitled “Repatriation of Remains Solution.”

What really caught my eye was the body copy (no pun intended). It translates to: “Insurance for burial in your country of origin!” Is the exclamation point really necessary? Is it supposed to lighten up what is already a rather solemn subject? Does it indicate that I should feel lucky that I bought the said insurance? It seems almost apologetic.

Turns out there are nine products on this page. Each has a one-sentence product description — and each description ends in an exclamation point. The copy may do the job when it comes to SEO, but did anybody think about how it reads? What is with this French obsession with exclamation points?

And if you look closely at the photo, it gets even weirder. What is it supposed to represent? Two people standing at a graveside? One person about to be hit by a falling tree? Again proof that there’s more to content than words.

Leave a Comment
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 353 other followers